The candidate offered a ________ argument that seemed convincing but was actually flawed.

The candidate offered a ________ argument that seemed convincing but was actually flawed.

• A. Specious
• B. Temporal
• C. Felicity
• D. Extant

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is identifying words that describe arguments that look convincing on the surface but are actually flawed. Specious means something that appears plausible or attractive but is misleading or fallacious. The sentence describes a claim that seemed convincing yet wasn’t sound upon closer inspection, which is exactly what a specious argument is. Temporal would relate to time, not the quality of the argument. Felicity refers to happiness or aptness of expression, which isn’t about an argument being flawed. Extant means existing or surviving, which has nothing to do with the argumentative quality.

The main idea here is identifying words that describe arguments that look convincing on the surface but are actually flawed. Specious means something that appears plausible or attractive but is misleading or fallacious. The sentence describes a claim that seemed convincing yet wasn’t sound upon closer inspection, which is exactly what a specious argument is.

Temporal would relate to time, not the quality of the argument. Felicity refers to happiness or aptness of expression, which isn’t about an argument being flawed. Extant means existing or surviving, which has nothing to do with the argumentative quality.